In November 1621, Governor William Bradford organized a celebratory feast after the Pilgrims' first corn harvest proved successful. This is now remembered as American’s “first Thanksgiving”. For more than two centuries the events were celebrated by independent colonies across various dates. It wasn't until 1863, in the midst of Civil War, that president Lincoln declared Thanksgiving to be a national day to be held every November. Because of the close proximity with Christmas and the shopping season, the day after Thanksgiving became the heaven to both retailers and shoppers alike. But has the influence of this day gone too far?
In the 1950s and '60s the term and idea behind Black Friday (the name itself came from the idea that this is the first time that retailers make annual profit or are 'in the black') became more popular - it became the linchpin and kickoff to holiday shopping. For many years retailers opened stores at 6:00 a.m. on Friday, the day after Thanksgiving. This tradition was held but times crept earlier and earlier to 5:00 and even 4:00. For the first time ever, several large retailers opened at midnight Friday in 2011, and in 2012, Walmart and several others announced they were opening at 8:00 p.m. on Thanksgiving Day. At this point hasn't Black Friday gone too far? Hasn't the desire of shoppers to get a couple hours head start on shopping and of retailers to make their money a little bit earlier crept too far? Are we starting to lose the holiday? If this wasn't enough, this year, Kmart stores opened at 6:00 a.m., Old Navy stores opened 3 hours later at 9:00, and a large majority of retailers opened for business at 8:00 p.m - all on Thanksgiving Day. Not only this, retailers announced pre-Black Friday sales this year, and these promotional sales have served to inflate the hype. So has Thanksgiving just become a Black Friday warm-up?
These events have obviously not gone unnoticed, and there is opposition and support of both sides. In 2011, more than 200,000 people signed a petition on Change.org called “Tell Target to Save Thanksgiving". A Facebook Page called “Say No To Shopping on Thanksgiving” has more than 58,000 'likes'. For many, Black Friday is a fun, if not at least adrenaline-inducing, event - but opening on Thanksgiving is just ridiculous. Thanksgiving was meant to be a day for thanks and gratefulness, but it has turned into the day where we eat turkey so we're full and ready to shop later in the night. Thanksgiving was supposed to be a day of giving gratitude and has turned into a warm-up for the shopping season.
Friday, November 29, 2013
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Is ignorance bliss?
Ignorance - the lack of knowledge or information
Bliss - perfect happiness; great joy
So why are these two things connected at all? Perhaps the more accurate, but still heavily flawed, statement is 'ignorance is innocence'. If one knows of nothing, how can one possibly be corrupt? This statement is refuted by the satirical poem "The History Teacher" by Billy Collins. The statement also implies two things:
that retaining knowledge from someone, making them ignorant, somehow to protects 'innocence', and that knowledge leads to corruption.
For the former statement: “Ignorance is not innocence, but sin." - Robert Browning. Although the reality isn't as harsh as this, ignorance is by and far not true innocence. Here we look at the connotations of the two words. One is obviously positive and the other is likewise negative. Now consider the type of people society generally applies these words to. 'Innocence' is the word which we use for children - those who are to young to know anything - and 'ignorance' is the term which we use for adults - who refuse to know anything. Children must be educated so that they do not become ignorant, trapped in their own well and unable to see the ocean beyond them.
For the latter statement, a logical fallacy was probably put into place to achieve this. It may have gone something like this: knowledge is power, and power corrupts, so knowledge corrupts. This is, of course, a logical error. The true quote is "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely". Since knowledge is never absolute, it can never become 'absolute power'. Also, with knowledge comes humility, so learning should never lead to corruption.
Bliss - perfect happiness; great joy
So why are these two things connected at all? Perhaps the more accurate, but still heavily flawed, statement is 'ignorance is innocence'. If one knows of nothing, how can one possibly be corrupt? This statement is refuted by the satirical poem "The History Teacher" by Billy Collins. The statement also implies two things:
that retaining knowledge from someone, making them ignorant, somehow to protects 'innocence', and that knowledge leads to corruption.
For the former statement: “Ignorance is not innocence, but sin." - Robert Browning. Although the reality isn't as harsh as this, ignorance is by and far not true innocence. Here we look at the connotations of the two words. One is obviously positive and the other is likewise negative. Now consider the type of people society generally applies these words to. 'Innocence' is the word which we use for children - those who are to young to know anything - and 'ignorance' is the term which we use for adults - who refuse to know anything. Children must be educated so that they do not become ignorant, trapped in their own well and unable to see the ocean beyond them.
For the latter statement, a logical fallacy was probably put into place to achieve this. It may have gone something like this: knowledge is power, and power corrupts, so knowledge corrupts. This is, of course, a logical error. The true quote is "Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely". Since knowledge is never absolute, it can never become 'absolute power'. Also, with knowledge comes humility, so learning should never lead to corruption.
Sunday, November 17, 2013
#Punctuation
Grammar is undoubtedly vital for clear and effective communication; thus, punctuation, being a subset of grammar, plays a role in facilitating understanding. Despite this, punctuation is not meant to be set in stone and has and will continue to evolve and adapt to our changing culture and society.
The most important purpose that language serves is to convey our thoughts to others; the way we communicate constantly evolves with technology and time so language should, and does, reflect that. Punctuation, along with grammar, serves to set a outline of our thoughts. Like an outline, punctuation has a few key aspects which can affect our writing, like the oxford comma (source G), but the rest is merely detail subject to whim and change. This becomes blatantly obvious when considering the numerous punctuation marks that, although they possibly had meaning in their time, have "come and [gone]" (source A). Punctuation can thus also fall into usage; for example, the semi-colon, although disdained by an older writer like Kurt Vonnegut, is widely used today and not only serves a grammatical purpose but also ties a writer's thoughts more clearly (Source F). The technological changes of the 21st century and the influence of Twitter and Facebook has also brought about several new punctuation marks, the @ symbol and # hashtag, which will most likely fade out of usage within the next century (Source A&H). Even before the large technological revolution of the late 20th century, writers and society in general challenged traditional punctuation and its rigid set or rules. Emily Dickinson, whose poetry became staples of her era's work, wrote of how the lax rules of poetry allowed for freer writings that conveyed more meaning than the conventional prose before her. By relinquishing the chains of strict punctuation, poetry has "more numerous of windows -- / Superior -- For doors--" (source C) and opens itself up to possibility.
The most important purpose that language serves is to convey our thoughts to others; the way we communicate constantly evolves with technology and time so language should, and does, reflect that. Punctuation, along with grammar, serves to set a outline of our thoughts. Like an outline, punctuation has a few key aspects which can affect our writing, like the oxford comma (source G), but the rest is merely detail subject to whim and change. This becomes blatantly obvious when considering the numerous punctuation marks that, although they possibly had meaning in their time, have "come and [gone]" (source A). Punctuation can thus also fall into usage; for example, the semi-colon, although disdained by an older writer like Kurt Vonnegut, is widely used today and not only serves a grammatical purpose but also ties a writer's thoughts more clearly (Source F). The technological changes of the 21st century and the influence of Twitter and Facebook has also brought about several new punctuation marks, the @ symbol and # hashtag, which will most likely fade out of usage within the next century (Source A&H). Even before the large technological revolution of the late 20th century, writers and society in general challenged traditional punctuation and its rigid set or rules. Emily Dickinson, whose poetry became staples of her era's work, wrote of how the lax rules of poetry allowed for freer writings that conveyed more meaning than the conventional prose before her. By relinquishing the chains of strict punctuation, poetry has "more numerous of windows -- / Superior -- For doors--" (source C) and opens itself up to possibility.
Sunday, November 10, 2013
Secrets
Why do we keep them? Some secrets aren't that big, such as having a celebrity crush or something. But depending on the severity and the importance of a secret, it can literally gnaw away at your soul, as was seen in The Scarlet Letter through Dimmesdale's mental and physical deterioration. So the question is: why do we keep them?
The number one reason that we keep secrets is to keep the peace. We hold onto secrets in order to keep others blissful, content, set in their vision of the world, and in their vision of us. Secrets can form the strongest walls between people and within people. They are what keeps the world moving but also what stagnates our ability to grow. Secrets can range from the little white lies people tell, "yes, I know what you're talking about", to our deepest thoughts and secrets - ones we take to the grave. Obviously, most of the secrets we keep and most of the lies we tell fall somewhere in between. Now we should first put some boundaries on what can be considered a 'lie'. Lies can be as small as a nudge of the truth when telling some gossip to different people; they can be telling a half-truth and omitting some 'irrelevant' details. How big a lie can get . . . well there really is no upper limit.
When asked if I lie, I, along with most rational people, would say no. Most people would also say that they don't keep secrets. This is our instinctive reaction - why would I tell a lie or a keep a secret and then talk about it? Many times, we don't intentionally tell lies, they are a product of trying to justify our thoughts or actions and are a manifestation of how we try to live up to our own image.
So why are lies so harmful? Let's look at this in a roundabout manner. If I ever catch myself telling a lie, there is about a 10 minute grace period in which I would come clean about it. Every minute and hour outside this period makes it harder and harder to tell the truth. If I fess up about something, most often a metaphoric weight is lifted off my shoulders and I (but maybe not the person I lied to) will feel better. If I don't come to terms with the lie, I'll hang a "poor me" banner around myself and try to tell myself that it was really the other person's fault and that I was justified in my actions. Of course, this never really works out. So in the end we reach this: no matter how bad telling the truth might seem, there are ways in which everyone, ultimately, is healed.
The number one reason that we keep secrets is to keep the peace. We hold onto secrets in order to keep others blissful, content, set in their vision of the world, and in their vision of us. Secrets can form the strongest walls between people and within people. They are what keeps the world moving but also what stagnates our ability to grow. Secrets can range from the little white lies people tell, "yes, I know what you're talking about", to our deepest thoughts and secrets - ones we take to the grave. Obviously, most of the secrets we keep and most of the lies we tell fall somewhere in between. Now we should first put some boundaries on what can be considered a 'lie'. Lies can be as small as a nudge of the truth when telling some gossip to different people; they can be telling a half-truth and omitting some 'irrelevant' details. How big a lie can get . . . well there really is no upper limit.
When asked if I lie, I, along with most rational people, would say no. Most people would also say that they don't keep secrets. This is our instinctive reaction - why would I tell a lie or a keep a secret and then talk about it? Many times, we don't intentionally tell lies, they are a product of trying to justify our thoughts or actions and are a manifestation of how we try to live up to our own image.
So why are lies so harmful? Let's look at this in a roundabout manner. If I ever catch myself telling a lie, there is about a 10 minute grace period in which I would come clean about it. Every minute and hour outside this period makes it harder and harder to tell the truth. If I fess up about something, most often a metaphoric weight is lifted off my shoulders and I (but maybe not the person I lied to) will feel better. If I don't come to terms with the lie, I'll hang a "poor me" banner around myself and try to tell myself that it was really the other person's fault and that I was justified in my actions. Of course, this never really works out. So in the end we reach this: no matter how bad telling the truth might seem, there are ways in which everyone, ultimately, is healed.
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Perspective
My view. Your view. His view. Her view. Their view. Our view. Given any prompt, event, or occurrence, hundreds of interpretations can and will be taken and the way we perceive what happened will vary. Perspective plays a huge role in how we see the world around us and the people we interact with, giving everything a twist. Almost everything in this world is subjective to a point, and the way we perceive things, from a narrow view to the big picture, completely changes the world's influence on us and our influence on the world.
There are several places in which perspective changes our views: negative or positive view, events and significance, and amount of empathy. For the first, we can consider a crying baby. To most people, this would be largely annoying and placed in a negative light, we might think of telling the mother to keep her child under control. However, what if a women who could not have a child, or one who had several miscarriages were in the same situation; she might be envious of the chance to do this. For the second, we consider the impact of time on our view of the world. In a study conducted on people who had life-changing events, winning the lottery and becoming paralyzed, it was found that both parties experienced the same level of happiness just a month after. Our perspective of triumphs and downfalls becomes dulled after time and we may not view today's decisions as the same tomorrow. For the third, we can relate back to our first example. Our personal experiences puts us in a perspective which allows for a certain amount of empathy.
Here's a short story modeled after one I've read recently.
There is a large construction site with nothing but small base and pile of bricks. Three men are working on the site and are all doing the same task, taking a brick, laying it upon the base and then cementing it on. When asked what they were doing, the three men responded like this: the first man said, "I am laying some bricks"; the second man said, "I am building a wall", the third man smiled and answered, "I am building a cathedral".
Here it is evident that something between the men was different - and that was their respective perspectives. Each man was doing the same thing, but their ability to see the bigger picture changed their attitudes and views.
There are several places in which perspective changes our views: negative or positive view, events and significance, and amount of empathy. For the first, we can consider a crying baby. To most people, this would be largely annoying and placed in a negative light, we might think of telling the mother to keep her child under control. However, what if a women who could not have a child, or one who had several miscarriages were in the same situation; she might be envious of the chance to do this. For the second, we consider the impact of time on our view of the world. In a study conducted on people who had life-changing events, winning the lottery and becoming paralyzed, it was found that both parties experienced the same level of happiness just a month after. Our perspective of triumphs and downfalls becomes dulled after time and we may not view today's decisions as the same tomorrow. For the third, we can relate back to our first example. Our personal experiences puts us in a perspective which allows for a certain amount of empathy.
Here's a short story modeled after one I've read recently.
There is a large construction site with nothing but small base and pile of bricks. Three men are working on the site and are all doing the same task, taking a brick, laying it upon the base and then cementing it on. When asked what they were doing, the three men responded like this: the first man said, "I am laying some bricks"; the second man said, "I am building a wall", the third man smiled and answered, "I am building a cathedral".
Here it is evident that something between the men was different - and that was their respective perspectives. Each man was doing the same thing, but their ability to see the bigger picture changed their attitudes and views.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)